cdc-coteauxdegaronne
» » The Federal Principle in American Politics, 1790-1833
eBook The Federal Principle in American Politics, 1790-1833 ePub

eBook The Federal Principle in American Politics, 1790-1833 ePub

by Andrew C. Lenner

  • ISBN: 0742520714
  • Category: Humanities
  • Subcategory: Other
  • Author: Andrew C. Lenner
  • Language: English
  • Publisher: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; 1st edition (May 25, 2001)
  • Pages: 223
  • ePub book: 1335 kb
  • Fb2 book: 1632 kb
  • Other: docx rtf docx lrf
  • Rating: 4.4
  • Votes: 649

Description

Lenner examines the constitutional conflicts of the republic's first decade, discusses Virginia's three Republican Presidents .

Lenner examines the constitutional conflicts of the republic's first decade, discusses Virginia's three Republican Presidents, the political and constitutional thought of the National and Old Republicans, the nature of the Jacksonian movement, the doctrine of dual sovereignty, and the nullification crisis. In examining the conflicts of the revolutionary era, Lenner's work provides a ground-breaking overview of the "culture of he clash of ideas about the nature and structure of Union-that pervaded the early republic.

Start by marking The Federal Principle in American Politics, 1790-1833 as Want to Read . Republicans like James Madison and Andrew Jackson felt republicanism could only flourish if state and federal authorities confined themselves to their proper spheres.

Start by marking The Federal Principle in American Politics, 1790-1833 as Want to Read: Want to Read savin. ant to Read. Federalists like Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Wilson believed in a more expansive role for the federal government (based on the common law and the law of nations).

Richard Bruce Bernstein.

In the early republic, constitutional debates over federal-state relations were fundamental to party battles and divergent conceptions of republicanism

In the early republic, constitutional debates over federal-state relations were fundamental to party battles and divergent conceptions of republicanism. Then, as now, theories about the sources and nature of federal power informed public debate, policy, and judicial decisions. For John C. Calhoun, the recognition of the equality of the states by the federal government was a precondition for preserving and strengthening republican liberty.

Federal Principles in American Politics, 1790-1833. Federal Principles in American Politics, 1790-1833. 1 2 3 4 5. Want to Read.

Journal of Southern History This book usefully reminds us how much all Americans once cared about federalism and tried to respect its principles.

Personal Name: Lenner, Andrew. On this site it is impossible to download the book, read the book online or get the contents of a book. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, (c)2001. The administration of the site is not responsible for the content of the site. The data of catalog based on open source database. All rights are reserved by their owners.

The Dred Scott Case: Its Significance in American Law and Politics is a 1978 non-fiction book by the American historian Don E. Fehrenbacher, published by Oxford University Press. The book explores the US Supreme Court case Dred Scott v. Sandford, in which the court ruled that the federal government could not regulate slavery in the territories. In 1979, The Dred Scott Case was awarded the Pulitzer Prize for History.

Lenner, Andrew C. (2001), "The Federal Principle in American Politics, 1790-1833. United States Senator from Virginia (1790–1794). Delegate to the Congress of the Confederation from Virginia (1783–1786). Rowman & Littlefield, . 52.

The Federal Principle in American Politics. Lanham, M. Rowman and Littlefield, 2001. Dictionary of American History. States' Rights and the Union: Imperium in Imperio, 1776–1876. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2000. K. R. ConstantineGutzman.

In the early republic, constitutional debates over federal-state relations were fundamental to party battles and divergent conceptions of republicanism. Then, as now, theories about the sources and nature of federal power informed public debate, policy, and judicial decisions. For John C. Calhoun, the recognition of the equality of the states by the federal government was a precondition for preserving and strengthening republican liberty.Republicans like James Madison and Andrew Jackson felt republicanism could only flourish if state and federal authorities confined themselves to their proper spheres. Federalists like Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Wilson believed in a more expansive role for the federal government (based on the common law and the law of nations). Lenner examines the constitutional conflicts of the republic's first decade, discusses Virginia's three Republican Presidents, the political and constitutional thought of the National and Old Republicans, the nature of the Jacksonian movement, the doctrine of dual sovereignty, and the nullification crisis. In examining the conflicts of the revolutionary era, Lenner's work provides a ground-breaking overview of the "culture of constitutionalism"―the clash of ideas about the nature and structure of Union―that pervaded the early republic.

Comments

Gold Crown Gold Crown
This is a brilliant new interpretation of the early national period by an up and coming young scholar. Anyone interested in the causes of political strife in the early republic should pay attention to this well informed political/legal/constituional history. This is a book that takes ideas seriously and author who has uncovered a new discourse or language among political actors.
Anyone who truly wants to understand what the founding generation thought of the Constitution should consult this study. I have personally studied the era for years, and I was pleasantly surprised by the new and engaging material presented here. Essential reading for students of early american history.
generation of new generation of new
This is a stunning new history of federalism in the formative years of the American republic. Dr. Lenner uncovers the "original understanding" of federalism in the context of the two party system, and shows how there were really three divergent "original understandings." Old controversies are seen in a new light, and new concepts like the law of nations are presented in a novel and path-breaking manner.
Yar Yar
THIS BOOK IS AN OUTRAGEOUS COPY AND SYNOPSIS OF FAMOUS AUTHORS WORK. WHEN I FIRST READ THIS BOOK I CERTAINLY RECOGNIZED FAMOUS QUOTES AND PARAGRAPHS OF FAMOUS WRITERS OF AMERICAN HISTORY. A BOOK NOT ORIGINAL. DID NOT SHOW EXCITMENT OR HIGH KNOWLEDGE IN HISTORY. I WOULD NOT SPEND MY MONEY BUYING THIS "BOOK."